|
Research on Instruction
|
||||||||
Summary:This page discusses the need for teachers to evaluate information about instructional practices from journal articles and conference presentations. |
|||||||||
|
Educators have access to a quantity of information about classroom practices that can affect learning. Some of these interventions are based in methodical, scientific research studies, but some come from the realm of “Hey, we tried this”. Both can be valuable, but teachers must ask, “what, who, where, when, why, how, and what's the funding source?” to put the information into a meaningful context. Both the No Child Left Behind Act and the 2004 reauthorization of IDEA recommend that practices considered for adoption in the classroom be based on peer-reviewed research studies. How can you tell if a journal article has been peer-reviewed or a conference presentation is research-based? What does “data-driven” really mean? Is there a way to separate information from opinion when considering teaching strategies? Follow this link to the Evaluate Information page. Taking the research idea a step further, teachers can collect data in their classrooms that will enhance their teaching skills and improve their students' performance. Follow this link to the Collect Classroom Data page. What Works Clearinghouse Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement National Center for Dissemination of Disability Research (NCDDR) National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities
(NICHCY) Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) National Center on Education Outcomes (NCEO) Educational Research Service (ERS) Project CENTRAL Promising Practices Network |
||||||||